"Gallopamil"

104 resultsPro users have access to +1 Systematic Reviews

Filter Results
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
                    • Pro

                            Clinical Area Pro

                            Further Refinement
                            User Guide

                            User Guide

                            1
                            Calcium Channel Blocker Reduces Airway Remodeling in Severe Asthma: a Proof-of-concept Study. Severe asthma is a major public health issue throughout the world. Increased bronchial smooth muscle (BSM) mass, a characteristic feature of airway remodeling in severe asthma, is associated with resistance to high-intensity treatment and poor prognosis. In vitro, the Ca(2+)-channel blocker gallopamil decreased the proliferation of BSM cells from patients with severe asthma. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of gallopamil on airway remodeling in patients with severe asthma. Subjects received either gallopamil (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15) for 1 year and were monitored for an additional 3-month period. Airway remodeling was analyzed at baseline
                            2
                            effects of EGCG. Furthermore, levels of cAMP and phosphorylation of phospholamban did not change with EGCG, indicating that the beta-receptor pathway is not involved. The L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors, nifedipine and gallopamil, failed to modulate EGCG-induced increase in contractility. However, the myocardial effects and intracellular calcium transients stimulated by EGCG were significantly reduced
                            Subscribe to Trip PRO for an enhanced experience
                            • Access to millions of Full-text articles where avaliable
                            • Unlock 100,000+ extra articles with Systematic Reviews
                            • Further Filtering Options
                            • No adverts
                            • Advanced Search Ability
                            • Enhanced SmartSearch showing unlimited related articles
                            Read more about Trip PRO
                            3
                            1990Cardiologia (Rome, Italy)
                            Evaluation of the effects of gallopamil in patients with effort angina by transesophageal atrial pacing two-dimensional echocardiography. Transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) 2D echocardiography was performed after placebo (P) and gallopamil (G) (0.03 mg/kg iv) in 12 patients with stable, reproducible, effort angina. If compared to P study, during G the following changes were observed: 3 out of the 12 patients did not experience angina, time to ST-1mm increased from 5.3 +/- 1.3 to 6.6 +/- 1.6 min (p less than 0.05), wall motion score was improved both at 130 b/min (15.3 +/- 4.1 drug P, 17 +/- 4.8 drug G, p less than 0.01) and at 150 b/min (10.9 +/- 5.7 drug P, 12.8 +/- 6.3 drug G, p = 0.07). In conclusion, gallopamil has a beneficial effect on atrial pacing induced ischemia: it increases
                            4
                            Effects of acute administration of gallopamil on left ventricular relaxation and filling dynamics in acute myocardial infarction assessed by Doppler echocardiography. The purpose of this study was to assess the acute effect of an intravenous bolus of the calcium antagonist gallopamil on left ventricular diastolic function using Doppler echocardiography. Fifteen patients with acute myocardial infarction in the first Killip class and sinus rhythm were randomized to an intravenous bolus of gallopamil (50 micrograms/kg over 5 minutes) or placebo in a crossover sequence. Doppler echocardiography was performed at baseline and 15 minutes after each bolus. No patients had received calcium antagonists or beta blockers before the study; all patients received nitroglycerin, which was withdrawn at least 2
                            5
                            [Efficacy and duration of effect of two delayed-action preparations of gallopamil in patients with exercise angina]. In 15 subjects (13 male, 2 female) with reproducible threshold ischaemic effort angina, the efficacy and the duration of the effect of two different formulations of gallopamil in equal doses were evaluated. One of these was gallopamil slow release administered twice daily (at 7.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m.) in doses of 100 mg. The other was action gallopamil immediate release administered four times daily (at 7.00 a.m., 1.00 p.m., 6.00 p.m., 11.00 p.m.) in doses of 50 mg. The double-blind study followed the cross-over model. After one week of run-in with placebo and two-weeks of treatment with active preparations, the patients underwent a clinical examination, an ambulatory
                            6
                            Echocardiographic evaluation of the effects of gallopamil on left ventricular function. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to determine global and regional left ventricular function in 32 patients treated with gallopamil (methoxyverapamil) for angina pectoris. Ejection fraction (EF), pressure/volume ratio (PVR), and segmental wall motion were assessed. Evaluations were made before therapy /ml/m2, T2 = 5.8 and 7.7 mm Hg/ml/m2, and T3 = 5.9 and 7.6 mm Hg/ml/m2, respectively). Wall motion remained the same or improved in 92.3% of the patients. In conclusion, gallopamil had no cardiodepressant effects in most patients. On the contrary, EF, PVR, and segmental contractility tended to improve with the higher doses.
                            7
                            Duration of protection of calcium channel blockers against exercise-induced bronchospasm: comparison of oral diltiazem and inhaled gallopamil. The present study was conducted to determine the duration of the positive effect of oral diltiazem and inhaled gallopamil in mild asthmatic volunteers, ages 18-37 years, with a history of exercise-induced asthma and a 25-56% decrease in FEV1 after a standardized exercise challenge. Oral diltiazem 120 mg, inhaled gallopamil 10 mg, and placebo were administered in a double blind, randomized, crossover manner on different days 48 h apart. Diltiazem was administered 90 min and gallopamil 30 min before the first exercise challenge. Challenges were then repeated 3 and 6 h later. Neither diltiazem nor gallopamil significantly altered baseline FVC, FEV1
                            8
                            1989Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
                            [Effect of calcium antagonists and beta receptor blockers on coronary vessel diameter]. 32 patients in an early state of coronary sclerosis were investigated in connection with diagnostic angiography. 8 patients received 2 mg gallopamil (G) and for every 12 patients 0.1 mg/kg propranolol (P), respectively, 0.12 mg/kg Atenolol (A). All medications were injected intravenously over 4 min
                            9
                            1989European heart journal
                            Objective evaluation of gallopamil in patients with chronic stable angina. Exercise testing, Holter monitoring, cross-sectional echocardiography and plasma levels. In this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study the effects of two dosages of gallopamil on exercise tolerance were evaluated in 12 patients with stable effort angina. After a pre-study screening aimed at assessing the reproducibility of the exercise response, the patients entered the study which consisted of three 7-day consecutive periods during which placebo or gallopamil 50 mg t.i.d. or gallopamil 75 mg t.i.d. were administered according to a randomized sequence. 24-hour Holter monitoring and cross-sectional echocardiography were performed on the 6th and 7th day of each treatment period, respectively. On the 7th day
                            10
                            Antianginal efficacy of gallopamil in comparison to nifedipine. In a randomized double-blind crossover trial 30 patients with chronic stable angina were studied to compare the antianginal actions of gallopamil (150 mg/day) and nifedipine. With the initial nifedipine dose of 60 mg/day, the trial had to be stopped because of severe exacerbation of angina in 3 patients of the nifedipine group . Twenty-one patients were entered into a second protocol with the nifedipine dose reduced to 30 mg/day. Compared to the preceding placebo period, the exercise time to onset of angina (+ 30%, P less than 0.01) and the total exercise time (+ 18%, P less than 0.01) were prolonged by gallopamil but not by nifedipine (+ 20 and 13%, respectively, not significant) with no significant difference between
                            11
                            [A comparative clinical study of calcium blockers, gallopamil and nifedipine, in the treatment of stable chest angina]. Twenty seven patients, 43 to 69 years of age, all with disabling stable angina and positive Bruce stress test, no amendable for revascularization procedures mainly because of poor distal coronary run-off by angiography, were studied with two calcium-channel blockers , the recently developed gallopamil hydrochloride and nifedipine hydrochloride. According to a double blind, cross-over protocol of 12 week duration and after a 2-week washout period, the patients randomly received during 4 weeks 50 mg gallopamil capsules t i d, or 10 mg nifedipine capsules t i d. After a second 2-week wash-out, the alternative drug was administered for another 4 weeks. The number of anginal
                            12
                            1989Fortschritte der Medizin
                            [Gallopamil and molsidomine in patients with coronary heart disease. A comparative study]. In a randomised, crossover trial, 20 patients with electrocardiographically proven coronary heart disease and exercise-inducible angina pectoris, the antiischemic effect of gallopamil (3 x 50 mg) and molsidomine (2 x 2 mg) were studied. Both therapies showed a clear anti-ischemic effect in bicycle exercise tests. The average ST-segment depression at maximal comparable workload was reduced from 0.16 mV (without medication) to 0.06 mV with gallopamil and 0.09 mV with molsidomine, the difference between the two therapies was significant (p less than or equal to 0.05). The increase in the heart rate, as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure during exercise, were less marked with both therapies
                            13
                            three times a day) in a randomized sequence for 2 wk each: verapamil (80 mg) and nifedipine (10 mg), verapamil (120 mg) and gallopamil (50 mg), or propafenone (150 mg) and quinidine (250 mg). Plasma digoxin concentration (PDC) rose during the cotreatments in the sequence: gallopamil (+16%) less than propafenone (+37%) less than nifedipine (+45%) less than verapamil (almost independent of dose, +69
                            14
                            Dose response of inhaled gallopamil (D600), a calcium channel blocker, in attenuating airway reactivity to methacholine and exercise. To determine if there is a dose-response relationship for calcium channel blockers in preventing experimentally induced bronchoconstriction, we evaluated the effects of inhaled gallopamil (D600), a potent methoxy derivative of verapamil, on airway reactivity to methacholine and exercise in volunteers with mild asthma. Methacholine challenges were completed by 11 subjects 2 hours before and 20 minutes after placebo, and 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mg of inhaled gallopamil administered in a single-blind, randomized manner on different days. Gallopamil did not significantly alter FVC, FEV1, or forced expiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC, but increased the dose
                            15
                            Inhibition of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction by a new calcium antagonist, gallopamil: comparison with cromolyn sodium. We have previously demonstrated partial attenuation of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction by aerosolized verapamil (Chest 1985;88:176-80). In the present investigation, we studied the effect of a new calcium antagonist, gallopamil, on allergic bronchial reactivity and compared it to that of cromolyn sodium. Nine asymptomatic subjects with ragweed hypersensitivity and a history of bronchial asthma were studied on 4 different days, without and after pretreatments with aerosolized placebo, gallopamil (10 mg), or cromolyn sodium (20 mg) solution, in a single-blind, randomized, crossover design. Bronchial reactivity was measured as the cumulative provocative dose
                            16
                            [Gallopamil in stable effort angina. Effects of 2 different dosages]. The effects of gallopamil, a calcium channel blocker methoxy derivative of verapamil, recently introduced into clinical use in Germany, were evaluated in 20 patients with stable exertional angina. Two different dosages of the drug were used: 25 mg tid and 50 mg tid. It was observed that both dosages improved exercise tolerance (355 +/- 95 sec after placebo; 462 +/- 78 sec, p less than 0.01 and 511 +/- 97 sec, p less than 0.01 after the two doses) while the time taken to produce ischemia (-1 mm ST depression) was significantly prolonged only by the higher dose of the drug (204 +/- 101 sec after placebo; 324 +/- 135 sec after gallopamil 150 mg, p less than 0.05). Both dosages of gallopamil caused a significant reduction
                            17
                            1989Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
                            [Therapeutic coronary effectiveness of retard gallopamil following repeated administration in comparison with placebo]. The aim of this randomized double-blind crossover trial was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of 100 mg slow-release gallopamil compared to placebo. The results of multistage exercise tests with computer-assisted ECG were analyzed in 16 patients (14 men and two women) aged 39 to 66 years who fulfilled the angiographical evidence of coronary heart disease with stable angina pectoris. All cardioactive medication was withdrawn for the duration of the study except for the trial medication and sublingual nitroglycerin as required. Patients began the therapy with a 5-day placebo run-in period. After this regimen, they were randomized to placebo or slow-release gallopamil (200 mg
                            18
                            1989Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
                            [Effectiveness of retard gallopamil in patients with stress-induced ST-segment depression and silent myocardial ischemias]. At a dosage of 75 mg b.i.d., gallopamil retard represents a suitable medication for the treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic episodes, as could be demonstrated in patients with coronary heart disease ascertained by angiography, positive exercise testing
                            19
                            1989Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
                            [Effect of 75 mg retard gallopamil on stress-induced myocardial ischemia]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study 40 patients with exercise-induced ischemic ST depression were given 75 mg gallopamil in slow release form twice daily. The study had 2 periods. After a 3 day run-in-period and a 14 day open therapy period exercise stress-tests were performed on a bicycle ergometer. 5 patients were dropped from this study. 25 of the remaining 35 patients were "responder" defined as a greater than 30% reduction of the ischemic St depression by gallopamil. These patients were randomly assigned to gallopamil or placebo. At the end of the first open period gallopamil significantly reduced the mean ischemic ST depression by 47% from 0.15 to 0.8 mV (p less than 0.0005). Compared
                            20
                            1989Zeitschrift für Kardiologie
                            [Randomized comparison between gallopamil and diltiazem in angiography verified coronary heart disease]. In a randomized study 30 patients (age 59 +/- 7) with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease were treated with either gallopamil (15 patients) or diltiazem (15 patients). After a 48-h-run-in period of treatment with nitrates the gallopamil group was treated with 3 X 60 mg/day , pulse rate, and ST-segment depression/Watt. Later the exercise tolerance and the difference of the exercise tolerance before and after the drug period was measured. The following parameters improved under gallopamil therapy: the gallopamil group showed a significant reduction of the anginal frequency/week (10 +/- 8 down to 3 +/- 2, p less than 0.001), the nitroglycerin consumption (1.4 +/- 1.4 down