"Bankart repair"

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability

The comparison between modified one-portal bankart repair to prevent suture tangling and standard two-portal arthroscopic bankart repair technique. We have carefully analyzed the letter to the editor by Lee, Chang-Tse, et al. and considered it highly significant. We value the inquiries. In order to address the concerns raised in the letter to the editor, we made the decision to prepare

The comparison between modified one-portal bankart repair to prevent suture tangling and standard two-portal arthroscopic bankart repair technique. We have carefully reviewed the letter to the editor by Kushtrim Grezda and deemed it highly noteworthy. To address the issues stated in the letter to the editor, we agreed to prepare the authors' response.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. A prospective study. Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair have never been prospectively compared under the concept of glenoid track in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, range of motion and recurrence rate between these two surgical techniques. We hypothesized that open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift would provide similar functional outcomes to isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair but with a lower recurrence rate. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 86 collision

Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using the 'door-locking' technique: excellent bone healing with a low complication rate. Arthroscopic repair is recommended for patients with bony Bankart lesions to restore anterior shoulder stability and avoid recurrent glenohumeral instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients following arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using a single suture anchor fixation technique named the "door-locking" technique. From January 2017 to February 2024, a consecutive series of 22 patients with acute bony Bankart lesions underwent shoulder arthroscopy. The size of the fragment was measured using computed tomography (CT). The range of motion (ROM) and functional scores including

Upper Extremity Limb Asymmetry May Complicate Objective Evaluation of Criteria Based Return to Sport Evaluation Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. While there are many reported post operative rehab protocols following arthroscopic Bankart repair, significant variability exists within each protocol, leaving a lack of consensus or standardized evaluation of return to play. As such, criteria the criteria based return to sport testing. Using the contralateral extremity, especially in the upper extremities, may not be the most accurate or appropriate control, however, and additional studies are needed in the search for an objective benchmark to return following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Return to Active Duty following Bankart Repair and Latarjet Procedure for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation in a Military Population: a Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Given that shoulder instability mostly affects young patients, it is likely that return to active duty (RTAD) is an important factor in the military population. However, knowledge on factors associated with failure to RTAD in this patient group following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and Latarjet is limited. The aims were to (1) assess RTAD rates following ABR and Latarjet (2) determine prognostic factors that are associated with failure to RTAD and (3) assess the degree of limitation in work performance due to shoulder complaints. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including consecutive patients who

Similar patient-reported outcomes, but lower re-dislocation and higher revision rates following primary Latarjet vs primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in patients with 10-20% glenoid bone loss at minimum 2 years follow-up. The amount of glenoid bone loss is closely related to the success rate of surgical treatment following anterior shoulder dislocations. There is an ongoing debate on the most successful treatment in patients with a subcritical amount (10-20%) of glenoid bone loss (GBL). This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following primary open Latarjet procedure and primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in patients with 10-20% GBL at minimum 2 years follow-up. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 53 patients with traumatic anterior shoulder

Risk Factors For Increased External Rotation Deficit After Combined Bankart Repair And Remplissage For Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability. External rotation (ER) deficit following Bankart repair and remplissage (BRR) is reported to be a major concern. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors which correlate with increased postoperative ER deficit in a population

A High Percentage of Healthy Volunteers Fail to Pass Criteria-Based Return-to-Sport Testing for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. This study aims to evaluate whether healthy volunteers can pass a previously published criteria based return to sport (CBRTS) protocol after Bankart repair. This was a prospective evaluation of asymptomatic volunteers conducted in March 2024. This study included 26 of participants passing was 23.1% (range, 19.2-30.8). Lastly, 50% of participants passed the CKCUE stability test, while 96.2% passed the unilateral shot put test. A non-dominant arm deficit was apparent in 4 of the 12 bilateral arm tests. This study demonstrates that a high percentage of healthy individuals are unable to pass many of the post-Bankart repair CBRTS protocol tests. Specifically, no participant

Arthroscopic Bankart repair using trans-glenoid double-loaded grand knots versus double-loaded suture anchors; is there a difference? a randomized controlled study. Anatomical repair of Bankart lesions and restoring the tension of the antero-inferior capsulo-labral complex is the optimum method of surgical treatment with a variety of fixation methods including suture anchors and trans-glenoid -year follow-up period. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using two double-loaded knotted suture anchors was performed in 78 cases (Group A) while repair was done using two trans-glenoid grand knots in other 92 cases (Group B). Patients were evaluated in terms of range of motion, functional scores (Constant, Rowe, and ASES), and complication rate. The mean operative time was significantly longer in Group B

Bankart Repair With Remplissage Restores Better Shoulder Stability Than Bankart Repair Alone, and Medial or Two Remplissage Anchors Increase Stability but Decrease Range of Motion: A Finite Element Analysis. To investigate the effects of the number and location of anchors for remplissage on postoperative glenohumeral biomechanics. A biomechanical study was conducted involving finite element model constructed based on data from the intact glenohumeral joint. Seven models were established, including a normal model, a model of Bankart lesion combined with "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesion, a model of Bankart repair alone, and 4 models of Bankart repair with remplissage based on different remplissage anchor numbers and locations. The effects of the number and location of the remplissage anchors

Biomechanical analysis of anterior stability after 15% glenoid bone loss: comparison of Bankart repair, dynamic anterior stabilization, dynamic anterior stabilization with Bankart repair, and Latarjet. Dynamic anterior shoulder stabilization (DAS) with Bankart repair is a recently described stabilization technique thought to be more robust than an isolated Bankart repair while avoiding many coracoid transfer-related complications and technical demands. DAS involves transfer of the long head biceps through a subscapularis split to the anterior glenoid to create a sling effect. We hypothesize that DAS with Bankart repair will restore anterior stability in a human-cadaveric model with subcritical (15%) glenoid bone loss. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested using an established shoulder

Glenohumeral morphological predictors of recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral morphological features on a magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) to determine risk factors for recurrence of anterior shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). A retrospective review of patients who underwent

Longer peripheral-track lesions are associated with instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. The Glenoid track concept has enabled the categorization of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) into on-track lesions and off-track lesions. Furthermore, among the on-track lesions, further categorization has been established based on the distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track, into peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions. Recent studies on peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions within the glenoid track have shown inconsistencies in failure rates, which deserves further investigation. A retrospective cohort comparison of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2015 and 2020 was performed. 102 patients

Editorial Commentary: Recurrence Rates Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Differ Among Contact and Collision Sports and Are Higher in Collision Sports. Collision and contact sports athletes are at higher risk of shoulder dislocations. In collision sports such as boxing, ice hockey, rugby, football, and various martial arts, the athlete purposely hits or collides with other athletes or objects

Good Clinical Outcomes and Low Recurrence Rate in Patients undergoing Arthroscopic Revision Latarjet for Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation. To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates. Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI

Return to sport after arthroscopic xenograft bone block associated with Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation in competitive contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Open Bankart repair and Latarjet stabilization are two of surgical procedures used in the treatment of shoulder instability in contact athletes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of bone block arthroscopic procedure, performed with xenograft, in combination with Bankart repair and selective subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. We retrospectively assessed contact athletes who underwent arthroscopic bone block with xenograft and Bankart repair with selective augmentation of subscapularis for recurrent anterior shoulder

High long-term failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair in younger patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations: A plea for early treatment. To determine arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes and recurrence risk factors at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data, single-cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair and those with a higher preoperative degree of instability also showed significantly higher rates of recurrence (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, p = 0.03). Postoperative ROWE, WOSI and SSV scores were significantly worse in patients with recurrent instability (p < 0.001). Return-to-sports rate was also lower in patients with postoperative recurrence (p < 0.001). The arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated

Prognostic factors for recurrent instability in recreational athletes following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a retrospective study with an average 4.1-year follow-up. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair, yielding varying results across different populations. However, there remains a dearth of studies specifically focused on evaluating outcomes in recreational athletes. A retrospective case series study was conducted on recreational athletes who underwent isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2013 and 2021. The primary outcome assessed was recurrent instability, defined as dislocation or subluxation. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, rates of returning to the same sports (RTS