"Interproximal reduction"

37 resultsPro users have access to +8 Systematic Reviews

Filter Results
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
                    • Pro

                            Clinical Area Pro

                            Further Refinement
                            User Guide

                            User Guide

                            1
                            Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel surface roughness and remineralization after interproximal reduction: An in vivo study. Interproximal reduction (IPR) damages the caries protective superficial layer of the enamel, making the enamel surface prone to caries because of the increase in surface roughness. Remineralizing solutions can help in preventing these undesirable side effects
                            2
                            Interproximal reduction in the refinement phase of Invisalign treatment: A quantitative analysis. Interproximal reduction (IPR) is a common adjunct to contemporary orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to carry out a quantitative analysis of IPR prescribed in the refinement phases of clear aligner therapy with the Invisalign appliance (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif). The digital treatment
                            Subscribe to Trip PRO for an enhanced experience
                            • Access to millions of Full-text articles where avaliable
                            • Unlock 100,000+ extra articles with Systematic Reviews
                            • Further Filtering Options
                            • No adverts
                            • Advanced Search Ability
                            • Enhanced SmartSearch showing unlimited related articles
                            Read more about Trip PRO
                            3
                            2022Journal of Orthodontics
                            Evaluation of the enamel nano-topography influenced by different techniques of interproximal reduction: An atomic force microscopic study. Interproximal enamel reduction is a part of the orthodontic treatment as a method of space generation in addition to other vast indications. Some studies found that different techniques might impose changes to the enamel surface that alter its topography , which in turn might influence its integrity and susceptibility to caries. Polishing, however, after this procedure is thought to be helpful to reduce these adverse effects. To evaluate the nano-topography of the enamel surfaces after interproximal reduction (IPR) and determine its influence on enamel surface roughness and examine the need for polishing to minimise these influences, when combined
                            4
                            Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction. Interproximal reduction (IPR) removes enamel and leaves grooves and furrows on the tooth surface, which may increase the risk of caries. The aims of this study were to assess the nanotopography of enamel surfaces produced by the most commonly used IPR instruments and to evaluate the effect of polishing after
                            5
                            2024PROSPERO
                            Comparison of Heat Generation between Manual Metal Strips and Motor Stripping Discs for Interproximal Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO
                            6
                            2014Scanning
                            The effect of zinc-carbonate hydroxyapatite versus fluoride on enamel surfaces after interproximal reduction. The aim of this study was to qualitatively investigate the effects of a zinc-carbonate hydroxyapatite (Zn-CHA) containing toothpaste on stripped enamel morphology in a pH cycling model in vitro and to compare the efficacy of this toothpaste versus fluoride one which still represent
                            7
                            2022PROSPERO
                            Assessment of severity of enamel roughness and incidence of caries after Interproximal Reduction. PROSPEROInternational prospective register of systematic reviews Print | PDFAssessment of severity of enamel roughness and incidence of caries after Interproximal Reduction.NEHA BADOLE, RASHMI JAWALEKAR, SHANTANU KALOKHE, RANA CHIKHALETo enable PROSPERO to focus on COVID-19 submissions CHIKHALE. Assessment of severity of enamel roughness and incidence of caries after Interproximal Reduction.. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022366342 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022366342Review questionHow severe is the enamel roughness and incidence of caries in treated and untreated tooth surfaces after interproximal reduction (IPR) in patients undergoing
                            8
                            2021PROSPERO
                            Effectiveness of Interproximal reduction vs single incisor tooth extractions in treating malocclusions - A systematic review Effectiveness of Interproximal reduction vs single incisor tooth extractions in treating malocclusions - A systematic review Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith
                            9
                            [Effect of different orthodontic interproximal reduction methods on the enamel]. To find a suitable interproximal enamel (IER) reduction method for clinical use by pH cycles in vitro. 50 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were collected for the experiment. After removal of the roots, the crowns were split vertically into two halves with wafer-thin wheel blade. Then the 100 samples
                            11
                            Evaluation of Resin Infiltration, Fluoride and the Biomimetic Mineralization of CPP-ACP in Protecting Enamel after Orthodontic Inter-Proximal Enamel Reduction. This study investigated the effect of using different agents for protecting enamel proximal surfaces against acidic attack after interproximal reduction (IPR) using the trans micro radiography technique. Seventy-five sound-proximal
                            12
                            the best-fit alignment tool in NX Imageware. The difference between the predicted and achieved rotational movements (DPARM) was calculated. Univariate analysis, categorical regression analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed on 7 variables: age, gender, tooth type, predicted rotational movement, attachment type, interproximal reduction (IPR), and the total number of active aligners. The mean DPARM
                            13
                            positions were maintained (SN-U1, 101.3°; IMPA, 88.8°), and soft-tissue profiles were improved (LL/E-line -1.1 mm; P < 0.001) after treatment. Maxillary and mandibular tooth-size arch length discrepancy of 12.4 mm and 6.7 mm, respectively, were resolved by molar distalization, interproximal reduction, and arch expansion, whereas incisor positions were maintained, and soft-tissue profiles were improved
                            14
                            interproximal reduction were obtained. Values at the initial ClinCheck Pro treatment plan were compared with those from additional aligner scans. Accuracy, the agreement between methods, and reliability were investigated using the Bland Altman method. A systematic under measurement was observed in the tooth widths measured by ClinCheck Pro (mean, 0.36 mm) compared with those obtained using 3D OP and digital
                            15
                            according to whether they completed the first series of aligners. Differences between these groups were compared with independent sample t tests, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors, including gender, age, extraction treatment, interproximal reduction, correction steps (steps in first series treatment
                            16
                            . More than 1 CAT system was used by most (63.92%), with in-house systems used by 21.63%. Orthodontists rarely or never (63.68%) performed premolar extraction treatment with CAT. Adjunctive interproximal reduction was reportedly mostly carried out to relieve crowding and reduce open gingival embrasures. The view that fixed appliances provide better outcomes was a major influence (71.43
                            18
                            , treatment plans underwent partial changes, like adding interproximal reduction or temporary anchorage devices. Practitioner confidence levels increased after viewing the setups. In cases where the treatment plan changed, the practitioner's confidence level in the plan increased the most, and the final confidence level was uniformly high among all practitioners. Practitioners reported the most helpful features of digital setups were the ability to superimpose the setup with the original model, determine the amount of tooth movement needed, check the final incisal relationship (overjet and overbite), and establish the amount of interproximal reduction required. Viewing digital setups resulted in changes to the treatment plans in about 24% of the cases. The use of digital setups was associated
                            19
                            with infrazygomatic crest anchorage and intermaxillary elastics. Interproximal reduction was performed to correct the black interdental spaces and the anterior flaring of the incisors. The scissors-bite and lingually inclined mandibular right posterior segment were sufficiently corrected after 3 months of treatment to establish adequate intermaxillary occlusion in the right posterior segments to intrude
                            20
                            of severe OIIRR, defined as both maxillary central incisors experiencing greater than a 25% reduction in root length, was found to be 1.25%. Potential risk factors included sex, malocclusion, crowding, and posttreatment approximation of apices to the cortical plates. Race, interproximal reduction, previous trauma to the teeth, elastics, age, treatment duration, and pretreatment approximation of apices