"Latamoxef"

54 resultsPro users have access to +0 Systematic Reviews

Filter Results
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
                    • Pro

                            Clinical Area Pro

                            Further Refinement
                            User Guide

                            User Guide

                            1
                            The combination of salvianolic acid A with latamoxef completely protects mice against lethal pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. (), especially methicillin-resistant (MRSA), is a major cause of pneumonia, resulting in severe morbidity and mortality in adults and children. Sortase A (SrtA), which mediates the anchoring of cell surface proteins in the cell A treatment reduced inflammation and protected mice against lethal pneumonia caused by MRSA. More significantly, full protection (a survival rate of 100%) was achieved when Sal A was administered in combination with latamoxef. Together, these results indicate that Sal A could be developed into a promising therapeutic drug to combat MRSA infections while limiting resistance development.
                            2
                            Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of latamoxef in neonates and young infants. There has been recent renewed interest in historical antibiotics because of the increased antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. Latamoxef, a semi-synthetic oxacephem antibiotic developed in 1980s, has recently been brought back into use for treatment of infections in newborns; however, it is still used off-label in neonatal clinical practice due to the lack of an evidence-based dosing regimen. This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of latamoxef in neonates and young infants, and to provide an evidence-based dosing regimen for newborns based on developmental pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD). Opportunistic blood samples from newborns treated with latamoxef were
                            Subscribe to Trip PRO for an enhanced experience
                            • Access to millions of Full-text articles where avaliable
                            • Unlock 100,000+ extra articles with Systematic Reviews
                            • Further Filtering Options
                            • No adverts
                            • Advanced Search Ability
                            • Enhanced SmartSearch showing unlimited related articles
                            Read more about Trip PRO
                            4
                            2019Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan
                            Review Analysis
                            Appears Promising
                            ?
                            Latamoxef sodium Hydroxyethylated starch 70000 Hydroxyethylated starch 70000/sodium chloride
                            6
                            2024EBioMedicine
                            (amoxicillin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, meropenem and latamoxef), commonly used to treat neonatal sepsis, were selected. The CDSS was constructed by incorporating the drug, patient, dosage, pharmacodynamic, and microbiological factors. The CatBoost ML algorithm was used to build the CDSS. Real-world studies were used to evaluate the CDSS performance. Virtual trials were used to compare the CDSS-optimized
                            8
                            Comparison of flomoxef with latamoxef in the treatment of sepsis and/or Gram-negative bacteremia in adult patients. The safety and efficacy of flomoxef and latamoxef were compared in the treatment of hospitalized patients with sepsis and/or Gram-negative bacteremia in a prospective, open-labelled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive 1 to 2 g intravenous doses of either flomoxef every 6 to 12 h, or latamoxef every 8 to 12 h. Data from 21 patients given flomoxef and 23 patients given latamoxef were included in the evaluation of efficacy. Flomoxef produced clinical cure and satisfactory microbiological responses in 85.7% and 100% of patients, respectively. These results were similar to those obtained with latamoxef (87% and 100%, respectively). In addition, no significant
                            12
                            animals. A total of 90 ESBL-producing ExPEC isolates from dogs and cats were tested for susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials with the agar dilution method. We also identified the ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases of these isolates with PCR and DNA sequencing.Results/Key findings. All isolates were susceptible to meropenem, tebipenem and amikacin (AMK), and various proportions were susceptible to latamoxef (LMX
                            13
                            , conferred the ESBL phenotype to all the K. oxytoca isolates except one. Based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints, all the ESBL phenotype K. pneumoniae were susceptible to doripenem, flomoxef, moxalactam (latamoxef), cefmetazole and tazobactam/piperacillin, whereas the ESBL phenotype K. oxytoca were susceptible to ceftazidime and ceftibuten in addition to the above
                            14
                            + latamoxef + amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium, and then changed to meropenem and Fusidic acid, but treatment showed no improvement. After adding the treatment with anti-inflammatory treatment, i.e., gamma globulin and methylprednisolone, the fever subsided. Conventional treatment with rifampicin + isoniazid 3 months after discharge from hospital were effective, and the axillary lymph nodes were
                            15
                            Cephalosporin therapy in intra-abdominal infection: comparative studies of cefotetan, latamoxef and cefoxitin. Two sequential randomised studies were performed to assess the efficacy of 3 different cephalosporins in the treatment of established intra-abdominal infections. In the first study 102 of 109 (94%) patients given cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours had a satisfactory clinical response compared to 51 of 56 (91%) patients given latamoxef 2g iv every 8 hours. In the second study cefotetan 2g iv every 12 hours was compared to cefoxitin 2g iv every 6 hours with satisfactory clinical responses in 93 of 95 (98%) cefotetan-treated patients and 41 of 43 (95%) cefoxitin-treated patients. Overall response rates in the two studies were lower in patients with severe peritonitis (82%) or nosocomial
                            16
                            Latamoxef: single agent prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. To assess the suitability of latamoxef (moxalactam) as single agent chemoprophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery, 120 consecutive patients were randomized to receive latamoxef (L) 1 g or cephazolin 1 g and metronidazole 500 mg (CM) administered intravenously at induction of anaesthesia and 6 and 12 h postoperatively. The groups were well matched for age, sex, pathology and procedures. Serum and tissue levels of latamoxef were well above the MIC90 for most bowel organisms. Inpatient stay was similar for both groups. Pyrexia was seen in 44 patients (11 L, 23 CM) and eight developed a wound infection (3 L, 5 CM). Major intra-abdominal sepsis occurred in seven patients (2 L, 5 CM), secondary to anastomotic leakage in four (1 L, 3 CM
                            17
                            Comparative serum bactericidal activity against test anaerobes in volunteers receiving imipenem, clindamycin, latamoxef and metronidazole. Ten healthy volunteers received on separate days the following regimens: imipenem 500 mg, clindamycin 600 mg, latamoxef 1 g, and metronidazole 500 mg. The antibiotics were given intravenously as an infusion over 15 min. Blood samples were obtained before clindamycin showed the highest inhibitory and bactericidal activities except against B. thetaiotaomicron and F. symbiosum. Imipenem had similar inhibitory and bactericidal activity to that shown by latamoxef. Metronidazole had a moderate activity against all strains although the activity persisted for 6 h. Latamoxef was the most active antibiotic against the test strain of C. perfringens.
                            18
                            Comparative efficacy and safety of ceftizoxime, cefotaxime and latamoxef in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia in high risk patients. One hundred and thirty-five patients with bacterial pneumonia who had risk factors (alcoholism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, corticosteroid therapy diabetes mellitus, advanced age, solid tumours) were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive either ceftizoxime (2-4 g every 8 h), cefotaxime (1-2 g every 4 h), or latamoxef (2-4 g every 8 h). Of the 84 patients evaluable for efficacy, clinical cure was achieved in 91%, 85%, and 89% of ceftizoxime- (20/22), cefotaxime-(23/27), and latamoxef-treated (31/35) patients, respectively. Adverse reactions occurred in one of 45 ceftizoxime-treated patients, one of 43 cefotaxime-treated patients
                            19
                            Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis of abdominal surgical wound infection: a trial of preoperative latamoxef against peroperative tetracycline lavage. A randomized controlled clinical trial was undertaken in 542 consecutive emergency and elective abdominal operations, with one group of patients receiving tetracycline peritoneal and wound lavage and the other a single intravenous injection of 1 g latamoxef at induction of anaesthesia. Seventy-five patients were withdrawn because no potentially contaminated hollow viscus was opened, and a further 36 because they could not be assessed for wound infection. Of the remaining 431 patients, 212 received latamoxef resulting in 5 major and 8 minor wound infections in hospital; another 4 minor infections occurred at home (total incidence 8.0
                            20
                            1986Acta medica Scandinavica
                            Latamoxef versus carbenicillin plus gentamicin or carbenicillin plus mecillinam in leukopenic, febrile patients with solid tumors. Sixty-six febrile episodes associated with leukopenia were observed in 56 patients with solid tumors, WBC less than 1.5 X 10(9)/l and temperature greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C. Stratification to antibiotic treatment regimen was made with regard to prior cis -dichlorodiamineplatinum (cis-platinum) treatment or not. Patients who had received no cis-platinum were randomized between carbenicillin 10 g every 8 h plus gentamicin 80 mg every 8 h or latamoxef 2 g every 8 h (group I). Patients having received cis-platinum were treated with carbenicillin 10 g every 8 h plus mecillinam 800 mg every 8 h or latamoxef 2 g every 8 h (group II). The first dose of latamoxef was preceded