"Patch test"

2,970 resultsPro users have access to +102 Systematic Reviews

Filter Results
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
          • Pro
                    • Pro

                            Clinical Area Pro

                            Further Refinement
                            User Guide

                            User Guide

                            1
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023. Patch test results may be influenced by age-related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results. We aim to evaluate the patch test results reflecting skin sensitisation, their relevance and association with clinical features by age group. Prospective multicentric study of all patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series in participating centres. Age groups were pre-defined as children (0- to 11-years), adolescents (12- to 18-years), young adults (19- to 30-years), middle-aged adults (31- to 65-years) and older adults (≥66-years). Occurrence of sensitisation, relevance and clinical features were compared
                            2
                            2023Contact Dermatitis
                            Use of sorbitan sesquioleate in patch test preparations and patch testing with the substance-What do our results mean? Sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO) is a sorbitan fatty acid ester, an emulsifier used in topical products and certain patch test preparations. SSO may affect the patch test results. It has been debated whether to include the substance in the baseline series to avoid misinterpretation of the results. To report the prevalence and simultaneous reactions of SSO with other patch test preparations containing SSO as an emulsifier. A retrospective analysis of 3539 dermatitis patients who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2020 was performed. The 5-year SSO contact allergy prevalence was 0.48%, and 1.3% had a doubtful reaction. Patients with a stronger positive reaction (2+, 3+) were more likely
                            Subscribe to Trip PRO for an enhanced experience
                            • Access to millions of Full-text articles where avaliable
                            • Unlock 100,000+ extra articles with Systematic Reviews
                            • Further Filtering Options
                            • No adverts
                            • Advanced Search Ability
                            • Enhanced SmartSearch showing unlimited related articles
                            Read more about Trip PRO
                            3
                            Patch Test-Positive Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome Due to Cycloserine in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Case Report with a Review of the Literature. Antitubercular treatment (ATT) is associated with multiple cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Second-line ATT is also associated with numerous adverse reactions; however, cutaneous reactions are under-reported . Oral drug provocation (ODP) in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is challenging because of the paucity of time and the risk of developing secondary drug resistance in the case of interrupted medication. In this paper, we report a case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms caused by cycloserine in an 18-year-old girl, which was confirmed with ODP and a patch test.
                            4
                            2025Contact Dermatitis
                            The 'MOAHLFA(P) Index': An Attempt to Standardise a Widely Used Array of Descriptors of Patch-Tested Patients. Since its inception in 1980, the MOHL index (% patients who are male, have occupational, hand, or leg dermatitis, respectively) and its later evolutions until the presently used MOAHLFA(P) index (adding % patients with atopic dermatitis, face dermatitis, age 40+ years and positive reaction(s) to ≥ 1 baseline series allergen) have been intended to convey important demographic and clinical information on the patients patch tested in a certain area and time, aiding the interpretation of the observed spectrum of sensitisation. To examine the current usage of the MOAHLFA(P) index and suggest consolidated definitions for its single items. A title/abstract search in Medline identified
                            5
                            2025Contact Dermatitis
                            Composition of Brazilian and Chinese Propolis for Patch Testing. In Amsterdam, in 2024, patch testing with Brazilian propolis yielded high rates of positive reactions (> 20%), whereas reactivity to Chinese propolis was significantly lower (3.5%). Differences in the composition were suggested as a possible explanation. 1. To study the composition of 3 propolis samples (2 Chinese and 1 Brazilian %). The volatile fractions of Brazilian propolis and Chinese propolis used for patch testing have very different compositions. Whether this causes or contributes to the differences in patch test reactivity has to be investigated further.
                            6
                            2025Ophthalmology
                            Patch Testing for Eyelid Dermatitis: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. To review the literature for protocols and results of patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in patients with noninfectious eyelid dermatitis. A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in July 2024. Articles were limited to original research for which an English language study (although the same allergens were not examined in every study): Balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae), cinnamic alcohol, fragrance mixes, gold, methylisothiazolinone, nail care products, neomycin, nickel, and personal care products (broadly defined as any product used by a patient at home). An ideal patch test panel for eyelid ACD remains to be determined; patients with suspected eyelid ACD
                            7
                            2025Contact Dermatitis
                            Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Propolis-Testing With Different Propolis Patch Test Materials. Propolis is a sticky substance produced by honeybees from plant resins collected from locally growing vegetation. Its chemical composition varies depending on the plant species visited by the bees. Contact dermatitis is commonly reported following exposure to cosmetics containing propolis or following the intake of food supplements. To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to propolis in two dermatology clinics in Europe. From February to July 2023, consecutive adult dermatitis patients were patch tested in the Department of Dermatology in Genova, Italy and in the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden, with propolis (10% in petrolatum) originating from China
                            8
                            2025Contact Dermatitis
                            Decoding Beta-Lactam Cross-Reactivity - Longitudinal Patch Testing From 2000 to 2022. Patients with non-immediate hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics (βL) often avoid all βL, with limitations for future therapy. Assess cross-reactivity between βL in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ni-CADRs). Retrospective analysis (2000-2022) of patients with suspected ni-CADR with βL as a possible culprit who underwent patch testing (PT) with an extended antibiotic series (10% pet., Chemotechnique Diagnostics or prepared in-house) according to European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) recommendations. Fisher exact test was used with a significance of 0.05 corrected for multiple testing; positive associations were quantified with odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Four
                            9
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Results of patch testing with five fragrance materials hitherto not tested: A dose-finding study in the clinical population. Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for skin sensitization is used to derive safe use levels of sensitising fragrance ingredients in products. Post-marketing surveillance of the prevalence of contact allergy to these ingredients provides relevant data to help evaluate the performance of these measures. To determine a suitable patch test concentration for five fragrance materials that had hitherto not been tested on a regular basis. These concentrations are then to be used in a surveillance study with patch testing consecutive patients over an extended monitoring period. Furaneol, CAS.3658-77-3; trans-2-hexenal, CAS.6728-26-3; 4,8-dimethyl-4,9-decadienal, CAS.71077-31-1
                            10
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Clinical relevance of doubtful reactions in patch testing: A single-centre retrospective study. Doubtful reactions in patch testing are infrequently reported in the literature; however, recent reports have suggested they be assessed with the same scrutiny as stronger reactions. Assess the clinical relevance of doubtful reactions in patch testing. Retrospective study of 1514 patients comprehensively patch tested via the NACDG standard series and additional allergens based on history. The clinical relevance of each reaction was graded based on the NACDG scale: definite, probable, possible, past, unknown and irritant. Reactions were considered 'unique' if an additional mild-to-strong reaction to the same chemical at a different concentration was not observed. 68.9% (1043) of patients
                            11
                            Examining the benefits of extended patch test series in children: a comprehensive analysis. The growing presence of allergens in materials and scarce data on allergic contact dermatitis in children has increased our need to refine its diagnosis in this population. We aimed to analyze children's specific responsivity to highly reactive subcomponents of Fragrance mix I, Fragrance mix II , and Textile dye mix from the European baseline series. We retrospectively analyzed patch test records of children aged 2 to 18 who underwent patch testing with the European baseline series between 2014 and 2022 in Israel. A total of 367 children were included in the study. In all, 160 children had positive results; 43 patients reacted to one of the mixes, and 20 performed further testing. Eleven of them
                            12
                            Exploring the relationship between allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis in children: insights from a retrospective patch testing analysis. Recent years have seen significant exploration into the potential link between allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis, yielding contradictory findings. A retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 2 to 18 who underwent patch dermatitis and those without (P = 0.848). Sub-analyses based on ethnicity, gender, and age did not reveal significant differences in overall European baseline series reactivity (P = 0.612, P = 0.446, P = 0.488, respectively). Sensitivity was notably higher when patch readings were conducted 72 h after application compared to 48 h [0.95 (CI: 0.91-0.97) vs. 0.60 (CI: 0.55-0.66)]. Patch testing is imperative
                            13
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Contact allergy to neomycin in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients from 2000 to 2023: A cross-sectional study. Neomycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic that may cause contact allergy. It was withdrawn as a medicine for human use in Denmark in October 2009 but is still found in some vaccines. To identify time trends in contact allergy to neomycin in the period from 2000 to 2023 . A cross-section study of patients ≥18 years consecutively patch-tested with neomycin sulfate (20% in pet.) at Gentofte Hospital, Denmark, during the period 2000-2023 was conducted. The overall prevalence of contact allergy to neomycin was 1.4%. The prevalence was significantly lower in the period '2010-2023' (1.2%) than in '2000-2009' (1.8%) (p < 0.005). Contact allergy to neomycin was significantly
                            14
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Patch tests in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions: Late readings on Day 4 is more sensitive than on Day 3. Patch tests (PTs) are recommended to identify the culprit drug in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (NICADRs). We recently reported that, in patients with NICADRs, a unique reading of PTs at day (D)2 compared with an additional second late reading at D4 missed (secondary outcome). During the study period, 249 patients underwent patch testing with D3 and D4 readings. Regarding the primary outcome, the first reading at D3 was positive for 13.7% of patients, and the reading at D4 for 24.9% of patients (p < 0.0001). Regarding the secondary outcome, only 9.6% of patients had all their positive PT at D3 compared with 24.9% of patients at D4 (p < 0.0001). Considering
                            15
                            Cost-effectiveness of patch testing allergens within the same group - a computational approach to optimize formaldehyde-related allergen selection. Patch testing to multiple cross reactive allergens for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) may not be necessary due to copositivity. We evaluated the formaldehyde group allergens to determine the optimal, most cost-effective allergens to test allergen optimally captures patients with clinically relevant ACD. Next, POP determined the optimal additional 1, 2, 3, etc. allergens. Cost per patch test was $5.19 (Medicare 2022). 9832 patients were tested to all listed allergens, with 830 having positive patch tests. POP determined that Quaternium 15 alone captures 53% of patients with ACD to the formaldehyde group; adding the optimal second allergen
                            16
                            Mitigation of retinol-induced skin irritation by physiologic lipids: Evidence from patch testing. There is a dearth of effective treatments to counter retinol-induced skin irritation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of three potential mitigants: (i) phytosteryl/octyldodecyl lauroyl glutamate (PLG), (ii) a physiologic lipid mixture (PLM) comprised of ceramide three and cholesterol , and (iii) niacinamide, in ameliorating irritation instigated by retinol. An occlusive human patch test, spanning 5 days, was undertaken on 18 Chinese participants aged between 23 and 40. It was designed as a randomized, double-blind, and vehicle-controlled study. Clinician erythema assessment (CEA) and instrumental evaluations were employed pre and post-test. Subsequently, a 4-week consumer in-use test
                            17
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Epidemiology of patch tested patients with permanent tattoos-A comparative analysis of 9693 IVDK patients (2020-2022). Permanent tattooing is the invasive introduction of tattoo ink (pigments) into the dermis. The ink and aftercare cosmetics applied on pre-damaged skin may contain skin sensitisers. To identify patient characteristics and the pattern of sensitisation in tattooed patients patch tested within the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Comparative analysis of patient characteristics and reaction frequencies to baseline series allergens in 1648 consecutive patients with and 8045 consecutive patients without permanent tattoos. Non-overlapping 95%-confidence intervals were considered as significant. Having permanent tattoos was related with female sex, age <40
                            18
                            2024Acta Dermato-Venereologica
                            Fragrance Contact Allergy - A Review Focusing on Patch Testing. Fragrance materials are widely used in various types of products in daily life and many of them can be contact sensitizers. Contact allergy to fragrances has been reported to be common worldwide. Unlike other groups of contact allergens such as metals and preservatives, fragrance materials in consumer products can be present as single fragrance chemicals or in the form of mixtures known as natural complex substances. Due to the complexity of the fragrance materials and the high number of fragrance substances known to cause contact sensitization, selecting suitable materials for patch testing is challenging. Emerging fragrance markers have been additionally introduced in different baseline series for screening to enhance
                            19
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Hand eczema in Italian patients referred for patch testing: A retrospective SIDAPA study (2016-2023). Hand eczema (HE) is a common skin disease with a negative impact on patients' quality of life in occupational and non-occupational settings. Up-to-date, data on HE in Italian patients referred for patch testing are lacking. To characterise the profile in terms of demographics, aetiology and patch test results of Italian patients affected by HE referred for patch testing. A retrospective descriptive study on consecutive patients affected by HE who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2023 in eight dermatology clinics was performed. HE patients were divided into two groups according to the exclusive (HE-only group) and not-exclusive (HE+ group) hand involvement, and compared to patients
                            20
                            2024Contact Dermatitis
                            Pandemic of sensitivity to acrylate containing nail cosmetic among young Israeli women? Result of patch testing 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in the European baseline series. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) was added into the European baseline series (EBS) in 2019. There is limited data regarding the frequency, relevance, and sources of exposure to HEMA. To investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of positive reactions to HEMA in the EBS in Israel, and explore sources of exposure. Retrospective cohort study that included all patients who underwent patch testing with the EBS in a tertiary center in Israel between 2020 and 2023. Positive reactions to HEMA were stratified by sex, six age groups, and year of study. Sources of exposure to HEMA as well as occupational data were