"Ranimustine"

Comparison of Nutrition-Related Adverse Events and Clinical Outcomes Between ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide) and MCEC (Ranimustine, Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Cyclophosphamide) Therapies as Pretreatment for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem C BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare nutrition-related adverse events and clinical outcomes of ifosfamide, carboplatin , and etoposide regimen (ICE therapy) and ranimustine, carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide regimen (MCEC therapy) instituted as pretreatment for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation between 2007 and 2012. Outcomes were compared between ICE therapy (n=14) and MCEC therapy (n=14

Possibility of a risk-adapted treatment strategy for untreated aggressive adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma (ATL) based on the ATL prognostic index: a supplementary analysis of the JCOG9801. JCOG9801, a randomized phase III trial, reported that vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VCAP); doxorubicin, ranimustine and prednisone (AMP); and vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin

of NK cells from patients who received the vincristine-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-prednisone (VCAP), doxorubicin-ranimustine-prednisone (AMP), and vindesine-etoposide-carboplatin-prednisone (VECP) (mLSG15) or mLSG15-like (-L) regimen, which is one of the standard of cares for newly diagnosed adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL), or the cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (CHOP

was achieved in seven smoldering patients with symptomatic treatment, in two with chronic disease using antivirals/chemotherapy, in one with acute disease using antivirals and in one lymphoma using the LSG15 regimen [vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (VCAP); doxorubicin, ranimustine, and prednisolone (AMP); and vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin, and prednisolone (VECP)]. Smoldering

with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisolone) /AMP (doxorubicin, ranimustine and prednisolone)/VECP (vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin BCSH Guidelines for the Management of Mature T-cell and NK-cell Neoplasms: Excluding cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Updated August 2013 Page 17 of 99 and prednisolone) compared to CHOP-14 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) alone (40% vs , pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, ranimustine, methotrexate, peplomycin, prednisolone) (Uozumi et al, 1998), OPEC/MPEC (vincristine, etoposide, prednisolone and cyclophosphamide /methotrexate, etoposide, prednisolone and cyclophosphamide) (Matsushita et al, 1999 ) and ATL-G-CSF (vincristine, vindesine, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, ranimustine and prednisolone with G-CSF

A randomized study comparing VMCP and MMPP in the treatment of multiple myeloma. To compare VMCP, a multidrug combination chemotherapy comprising vincristine (VCR), melphalan (MPH), cyclophosphamide (CPM) and prednisolone (PSL), with MMPP comprising MPH, ranimustine (MCNU), procarbazine, and PSL as induction, to elucidate the value of alternating combination chemotherapy, and to search

[Ranimustine]. In the clinical phase studies, ranimustine showed very excellent responses against chronic myelogenous leukemia, polycythemia vera and thrombocythemia, and moderate responses against lymphoma or myeloma. The feature of response was the long duration. In cases with CML, CR rate was 82% and maintained for 2-18 months by single administration. In a randomized controlled study , the efficacy of ranimustine was compared with that of busulfan in 77 evaluable previously untreated patients with CML. These included 40 patients for an MCNU group (M) and 37 for busulfan group (B). No difference was seen in the remission rate, crisis rate and survival. A significant difference was observed only in the period of CR. Ranimustine showed almost equal efficacy to that of busulfan

Superior efficacy of MMCP regimen compared with VMCP and MMPP regimens in the treatment of multiple myeloma. A newly designed combination chemotherapy for multiple myeloma, MMCP [ranimustine (MCNU), melphalan (MPH), cyclophosphamide (CPM) and prednisolone (PSL)], was analyzed and compared with the results of our previous randomized trial of VMCP [vincristine, MPH, CPM and PSL] and MMPP [MCNU

and chemotherapy with a nitrosourea (ranimustine: MCNU) for malignant astrocytomas received this regimen for up to four cycles. Three patients with anaplastic astrocytomas, one patient with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma and 6 patients with glioblastomas (3 men and 7 women), aged 27 to 69 years, were eligible and were evaluated for response and toxicity. Grade 2 and 3 hematological toxicities occurred in 4 (40

Phase III study of ranimustine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, melphalan, and prednisolone (MCNU-COP/MP) versus modified COP/MP in multiple myeloma: a Japan clinical oncology group study, JCOG 9301. To investigate whether combination chemotherapy with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisolone, and melphalan (COP/ MP) with the addition of ranimustine (MCNU) (MCNU-COP/MP) is superior

VCAP-AMP-VECP compared with biweekly CHOP for adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9801. Our previous phase II trial for treating human T-lymphotropic virus type I-associated adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATLL) with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VCAP), doxorubicin, ranimustine, and prednisone (AMP), and vindesine, etoposide

Induction therapy consisting of alternating cycles of ranimustine, vincristine, melphalan, dexamethasone and interferon alpha (ROAD-IN) and a randomized comparison of interferon alpha maintenance in multiple myeloma: a co-operative study in Japan. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of a new combination chemotherapy with a newly developed nitrosourea derivative ranimustine and evaluated the efficacy of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) maintenance in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The induction therapy (ROAD-IN) was a 6-week regimen consisting of chemotherapy with ranimustine, vincristine (Oncovin), melphalan (Alkeran) and dexamethasone starting on day 1 and IFN-alpha, which was administered three times weekly for 3 weeks starting on day 22. This was repeated for three

Clinical benefits of lenograstim in patients with neutropenia due to chemotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM). The object of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF; lenograstim) after combination chemotherapy consisting of ranimustine, vindesine, melphalan and prednisolone (MCNU-VMP). One hundred thirty

of G-CSF intravenously over 1 hour from day 1 of PBSCT) and 31 in the control group without treatment. Two distinct disease-oriented high-dose regimens without total body irradiation consisted of the MCVAC regimen using ranimustine (MCNU, 450 mg/m2), cytosine arabinoside (16 g/m2), etoposide (1.6 g/m2), and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) for patients with ALL, and the Hi-MEC regimen using melphalan

* Ranimustine * Streptozocin * Alkyl sulfonates: Busulfan